Techniques

Making Sense of Emotions

Mark Whiting, Sandrine McClure, and James Horton

The importance of emotions in building strong relationships between brands and consumers is well-documented. But nowadays, marketers are increasingly finding senses rather than words are the best way to make an emotional impact. Creating an engaging experience now means knowing how to tell a story that uses colours, aromas, sounds and sensations as part of a multifaceted and multi-layered narrative.

Emotional opportunities
Part of the reason why senses can be so evocative is to do with the way in which our brains function. Smell is perhaps the sense which is least harnessed by marketers, yet it is the only one which is directly hard-wired to our brains, with no transformation of the olfactory signal (scent) taking place on the way to the brain. This is why smell is particularly evocative and capable of triggering such strong emotions and memories, and even altering our moods. Particular scents create specific changes in our emotional states: the smell of vanilla, for example, has been proven to put people more at ease. Singapore Airlines is one of only a few brands to capitalise on the power of smell, and does so by consistently deploying its signature scent throughout a range of consumer touch points: it is worn by the cabin crew, added to towels handed out to passengers and diffused around the cabin before takeoff.

If smell is an emotionally powerful sense, other sensory stimuli such as sound are capable of influencing our behavior physiologically and psychologically. Sound can increase or decrease our heart rate, or literally give us the shivers, while tone of voice experiments have shown how sound can inspire feelings of trust or suspicion. It has the powerful capacity to deeply influence our behaviors, impacting the pace at which we walk or even how long we stay in a store or restaurant. A clearly-defined sound identity is also an excellent way of building top of mind awareness, but globally, it has been estimated that less than one in ten brands have one. Underwear brand DIM has successfully defined one, using a core musical gimmick of a few proprietary notes, consistently leveraged over time and constantly refreshed with different variations.

Touch has been called the demystifying sense. It brings tangibility and a sense of objectivity to what surrounds us. From an emotional standpoint, touch provides the feeling of having made an intimate encounter: touching something makes it your own. Researchers have found that shoppers who touch a product are more likely to purchase it. So touch is a pivotal, intimate sense that “closes the deal.” Brands are getting wise to the power of touch to add surprise and excitement to potentially banal brand experiences. Starbucks tactically places a variety of coffee beans on its waiting lines for people to touch, to enable buyers to imagine their tasting before it happens, and use craft paper to cue authenticity, freshness and genuineness to their customers.

With extended product offerings and an ever increasing pace of life, immediacy of impact will prove vital for brands in years to come. Sight is the first sense to come into play as consumers near a touch point, and many experiments have shown that is also central to product selection: 40% of all perfume purchase decisions are estimated to be based on the design of the bottle. Savvier consumers are increasingly expecting more visual sophistication from brands and as visual codes gain in maturity, brands will have to work hard to cue finer nuances.
There is a common belief that taste holds little potential for brands whose core equity is not rooted in food, but for many it could be an avenue worth exploring. Taste has an enviable stopping power, since flavour appreciation usually implies pausing, indulging and taking one’s time. So what could be taste’s contribution to a brand, especially a non-food or beverage related one? During a recent Kenzo catwalk show, guests were given patisseries designed by Lenôtre so they could “taste” the creativity of the brand’s designs as well as see it. More literally, Fanta’s ‘Drink your Magazine’ campaign used edible paper to pre-seed their product’s taste before the actual product experience. Consumers were invited to tear off a piece of the magazine and taste the flavour of Fanta.

Challenges on the ground
Brands preparing to take the sensory plunge must be careful to define exactly the feelings and associations they are trying to create, and to reflect this in a sensory identity that is unique, engaging and consistent with their personality. Even after achieving this, each sense brings its own set of deployment challenges for marketers.

For example, scent based marketing can be particularly tricky in terms of isolating the impact of each sense on consumer response: an excessive number of fragrances at retail points can be off-putting to consumers, and mobile living and the multiplication of touch points can generate olfactory chaos. To avoid this, we can think about deploying senses “negatively”: retailers including Selfridges department store in London are increasingly using in-store silence as a key way to disrupt sound conventions in a world constantly polluted by sound nuisance.
Senses might sometimes seem to be beyond the reach of a particular brand, and we might ask how a non-food brand could incorporate taste into their marketing mix. But senses are often more accessible than we might at first believe, and taste, for example, is easily reached through adjacent senses. For example, we strongly associate colors with tastes: red and orange are sweet, green and yellow are sour, while white tends to be salty. Even for brands whose only opportunity to deploy taste as a marketing tool comes through a PR or in-store event, it’s definitely time to stop relying on the standard fare from the caterer round the corner and think about how choice of flavours could actually strengthen the brand’s message; the fastest way to a consumer’s heart may be through their mouths.

The growth of online shopping and the propagation of digital experiences in all aspects of our daily life risk disconnecting consumers from sensory experiences. In terms of touch, brands have so far largely focused on how their packaging or products feel in a consumer’s hands. But increasingly, we are living with stream-lined devices and tactile interfaces: a new standard of touch has arisen. On the other hand, as remote/ e-purchasing comes to dominate, consumers may grow into the belief that touch is optional. Perhaps the only way to get around this issue is for marketers to invest more time and energy not just meeting consumers, but experiencing their brands as consumers experience them themselves. Whether working on alcohol (how does that glass feel in your hand?) or working in luxury (does prohibiting touch actually create more desire?), hands-on experience of the power of touch is ever more essential.

Finally, we must not forget that the triggers we associate with senses are culturally-biased and ever evolving: in visual terms, shape, symmetry, colour and materials often carry deeper meanings which are culturally conditioned. In a world with ever-renewing codes and signifiers, visual future-proofing is something which brands cannot afford to neglect. That’s why it is important to explore ‘raw culture’ for insight. We need to look for patterns, visual or otherwise, across a variety of creative genres, forms, markets and categories that collectively make up the cultural fabric used—typically subconsciously—by consumers to make sense of brands, products and communication. We must bear in mind the visual overload of consumers’ everyday experiences, and account for the chaotic and varying contexts in which a brand’s visual identity exists

Multisensory success
We have chosen to look at each of the five senses one by one, but they can of course be deployed in tandem to greater effect. One of the best examples of this comes from South Korea, where Dunkin’ Donuts set out to increase their sales by playing the company’s jingle in buses whilst simultaneously diffusing the smell of the brand’s signature coffee. Visits to stores near bus stops grew 16 % and the chain saw a 29 % overall increase in coffee sales during the campaign.

Through our journey exploring the senses, we have seen several examples that show how the ability to create engaging brand experiences relies increasingly on appealing to one or more senses. However, it is less obvious where and when brands should be seeking out congruency across all five senses as opposed to providing unexpected sensory contradictions. Inevitably, it will involve much trial and error, but our view is that brands that have the courage to make the leap into the new worlds of haptic technology (touch) and flavor replicators, or who delve into sound theory and semiotics to develop stronger visual and sound signatures will be amongst the winners in the race to be amongst the world’s best loved brands.

Mark Whiting is Director, Sandrine McClure is Director, and James Horton is Project Executive, at Added Value

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.
Please note that your e-mail address will not be publicly displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles