Trends

Measurement Trends For 2016

By Kristin Luck

The New Year is upon us, and with it, a rash of predictions about what the next 12 months will bring for the research industry, often with little accuracy. I was relieved to see that no industry analysts predicted 2016 to be the “year of mobile”….again.

Rather than focus on specific tools or technologies that will “revolutionize” marketing measurement, I look at greater business trends, which have a broader application and are more thematic in nature. Trends are also more inclusive. They allow us to connect the dots between brands and consumers in a way that can ultimately drive new measurement practices.

There are three key themes or trends that drive the firms I advise:

Simplification

The first is the idea of simplification. As researchers we have a bad habit of making things more complex than they truly need to be. Want to gauge customer satisfaction? Rather than asking what we really need to know, as Expedia does (one question – happy face/sad face), we labor to design a 45 minute survey that digs into every minutia of the buying experience. Does that additional 44 minutes really generate greater insights? It’s most likely that respondent engagement and, subsequently, data quality, suffer.

Simplification also wears other hats. From virtual reality (which when introduced by Lieberman Research Worldwide a few years back was scoffed at, only to become the darling of every research conference) to video driven interviews and incentive delivery via mobile devices to gamification. As researchers we don’t think of these methods as “simple” because it involves doing things differently. But from an engagement perspective we have a myriad of opportunities to connect with consumers in more interactive ways that make the research process infinitely more rewarding.

This also goes for how we interact with clients. Rather than delivering lengthy reports that struggle to speak marketers language, interactive data visualization and reporting systems now offer us the ability to tie market research directly to business KPI’s – and to do so in real time.

Don’t discount the importance of simplification.

Social/Passive Data

One of my favorite presentations of 2015 was delivered by Vesselin Popov of Cambridge University at IIEX North America. Popov is predicting psychological traits from digital footprints of behavior and he spoke about the potential for computerized approaches to entirely replace traditional, survey-based research. This is academic research ‘in the wild’ but when applied in a business context, the result is a more personalized experience for customers, deeper insight for clients and a collaborative dialogue between brands and their audience. Popov’s presentation was wildly unpopular for a marketing measurement conference and prompted a fair amount of debate over efficacy. That said, we’d be unwise to turn a blind eye toward passive measurement techniques. Companies like Affinio, who mine social media relational network connections and Networked Insights, who are using social data to predict Hollywood box office revenues before opening weekend, demonstrate that this trend is growing. The sooner we embrace secondary data streams as the new normal, the sooner we can effectively measure them.

Agile Research

Lastly, developing more agile processes with which to conduct research and deliver feedback is imperative to the long term survival of our industry. Lean Startup techniques and agile development have captured the hearts and minds of pretty much every Silicon Valley mega-brand and growth hacking wonk, yet have been largely ignored by market researchers. Our “build – test – learn” cycle is horrifyingly slow, primarily driven by our dated data collection methods. Moving to a more iterative design process that takes hours vs days and adopting on-demand research tools that shorten the data collection cycle accordingly will in turn drive more immediate learnings and shorten feedback loops. From Google’s “micro-moments” campaign to Zappistore’s automated self-service research marketplace, we have more opportunities than ever to embrace agile research methods.

But how to adopt these themes in your own research practice? Where to start? Rather than abandoning all hope, simply ask yourself these questions when writing your next proposal or project brief:

  • Am I making this study more complex than it needs to be?
  • Could the complexity ultimately be detrimental to respondent engagement?
  • Am I considering data sources, other than primary research data, which may provide less expensive and more actionable insights to my clients?

Am I delivering insights in a period of time such that I can deliver immediate impact for my client through feedback loops or KPI performance?

If the answers to any of these questions don’t support keeping research simple, taking alternative data sources into consideration or enabling the delivery of timely insights, then you’ve successfully illuminated some opportunities for change.

What are your themes for 2016?

Kristin Luck, www.kristinluck.com

4 comments

Divya, SurveyTabs Research February 11, 2016 at 6:11 am

Yes. Social or Passive data would be one of the major measurement indicators for next few years. One of my favorite example of use of social or passive data is the use social data from news items and mine it together to develop real-time news insights about a publicly traded company. Clients can take advantage of these insights to drive their real time investing decisions.

SurveyTabs Research, Bangalore
http://www.surveytabs.com

Reply
Measurement Trends For 2016 – Kristin Luck February 8, 2016 at 5:33 am

[…] Measurement Trends For 2016 […]

Reply
Maya Middlemiss January 21, 2016 at 12:12 pm

‘As simple as possible… But no simpler” – not sure who among many that should correctly be attributed to. But in terms of recruiting qual participants, it’s a trend I endorse wholeheartedly, particularly the idea of using technology to simplify. Too often research specifiers tend to forget that the (potential) participants in the research have no stake whatsoever in the outcome, beyond any immediate incentive. So horribly complex questionnaires and processes and project design are simply a barrier to engagement

Reply
Annie Pettit, Chief Research Officer, Peanut Labs January 13, 2016 at 3:16 pm

Totally agree. At the same time, let’s make sure that when we simplify things, we aren’t dumbing them down. We still need to ensure we apply rigour to our work and we need to fully understand the nuances that will apply to the actions we take. Simple doesn’t mean dumb.

Reply

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.
Please note that your e-mail address will not be publicly displayed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles